"Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against The West" - Abridged Version

This twelve minute summary of "Obsession:Radical Islam's War Against the West" is provided as an introduction. Understanding the barbaric nature of fundamentalist Islam should be the first priority of westerners who wish to preserve the only enlightened civilisation on modern earth. www.ObsessionTheMovie.com

Jihad: A History (Part 4 of 4)

Conclusion of Jihad History series. Primitive muslim culture feeds into violence and jihad. The barbarians are more vital and more prolific than more intelligent but more decadent westerners. The west has grown soft and politically correct--a pushover for a more aggressive and atavistic civilisation--n'est-ce pas? There is only one weakness contained within the putsch for muslim supremacist world control. More on that later.

Jihad: A History (Part 3 of 4)

Continuing with the history of bloody mindless jihad, from the Israeli response to growing Palestinain terror in Lebanon in 1982 onward. Islam=Jihad=Barbaric Terrorism. That is the salient equation coming from mosques around the world today. Islamic supremacism via the destruction of the "infidel" world. Islamic world conquest through bomb, bullet, and rusty knife.. Paradoxically, it is the prolific muslim womb that is laying the foundation for the deaths of millions that is to come from jihad in the near future.

Jihad: A History (Part 2 of 4)

Beginning with the overthrow of the Shah, Part 2 demonstrates how a failure by a weak US administration to respond to Shia fanaticism in Iran has led to the violence that has happened since.

Jihad: A history (Part 1 of 4)

Jihad has a long history. But the main thing to understand about jihad is that it is about destruction and killing--nothing else. Muslims may claim that jihad is meant to be about "internal struggle" but honestly, who are they kidding? Themselves?

North Korea - Children of the Secret State

North Korea demonstrates communism in its truest form--strong-arm dictatorship totalitarianism. Sure, I know Marx had other ends in mind when he browbeat all the others in his circle who disagreed with him. He had the noblest ends in mind when he forced his views on his fellows. Lenin had nobler ends in mind as well. My question is: who has the courage to step in and call the experiment what it is--an abysmal failure?

The Government--Not Your Friend: Hear the Baron

Baron Bodissey at Gates of Vienna blog has laid out a manifesto for non-governmental action by private citizens against the threat of encroaching barbarism that is islamism. For those who, like me, think governments are too deeply into appeasement and political correctness to do their citizens much good in this clash of civilisations, consider what the good Baron says:

* The legacy media control the view that most of the public has of what happens in the “War on Terror”.
* They want us to lose because Republicans are in charge.
* Therefore they threw the election to the Democrats.
* Thus we will get what we voted for from our elected officials: retreat, denial, passivity, appeasement, and dhimmitude.


But that’s just the government that I’m talking about, and the government is not where the action is now. The synchronicity of the election and my involvement with the 910 Group has opened a view into a whole new way of doing things. If we wait for the government to do things, we are doomed. If we expect the government to follow the prudent course and prosecute the Counterjihad with the appropriate zeal, we are living in a fantasy world.

The government is constrained by political reality, and political reality is conditioned (if not generated) by the MSM, so we are stuck with a useless government. Eventually the new media will supplant the old, and our viewpoints will become more like the norm. At that point elections might start to reflect what the majority of people really feel about Islam, multiculturalism, and illegal immigrants (a.k.a. “undocumented Democrats”). But we’ve got at least another ten years before that happens.

In the meantime, our Western governments — with the possible exception of Denmark and Australia — are going to be more of a hindrance than a help in fighting the information war against the Jihad. As I’ve said on numerous occasions, we’re on our own.
- - - - - - - - - -
But that’s our big advantage. Getting the government to react to an info-attack from the terrorists (via their media or CAIR surrogates) is like trying to turn a battleship to avoid a torpedo. As we form our networks we create new response mechanisms which can assess and counter the enemy’s offensives at the same speed at which the enemy operates.

More over at Gates of Vienna.

The challenge at this time is devising ways that concerned westerners can participate in effective action against the barbarians without having to wait till hell freezes over for their governments to act. The Baron has ideas. So do others. If Bush accomplished just one worthwhile thing with his presidency, it may just be focusing the efforts of violent jihadi supremacists on Iraq--where they largely self-destruct--while slow witted westerners belatedly come to their senses and recognize the need to act outside their governments.